Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Packers - Committed to their own
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 905933" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>LOL, you really do just see what you want. NOBODY has said Love is a HOF'er. Nobody said the pick was brilliant. why do people Pick Rodgers to Favre? oh maybe because it's the Packers and the last transition we had and a plausible reason they picked Love?</p><p></p><p>Considering I myself have said many times that QB's like Rodgers come around once every, well almost never as I think he's probably top 5 in the NFL ever when it comes to the total package, I think that speaks to itself how hard it is going to be to "replace" him. Most QB's picked are barely adequate on a good day. Everybody watching the NFL knows the likelihood of picking a decent QB let alone replacing a HOF'er with another HOF'er. </p><p></p><p>Does it need to be mentioned? I mean it has been, by myself included, multiple times, but does it even really need to be? The difficulty is obvious.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 905933, member: 10441"] LOL, you really do just see what you want. NOBODY has said Love is a HOF'er. Nobody said the pick was brilliant. why do people Pick Rodgers to Favre? oh maybe because it's the Packers and the last transition we had and a plausible reason they picked Love? Considering I myself have said many times that QB's like Rodgers come around once every, well almost never as I think he's probably top 5 in the NFL ever when it comes to the total package, I think that speaks to itself how hard it is going to be to "replace" him. Most QB's picked are barely adequate on a good day. Everybody watching the NFL knows the likelihood of picking a decent QB let alone replacing a HOF'er with another HOF'er. Does it need to be mentioned? I mean it has been, by myself included, multiple times, but does it even really need to be? The difficulty is obvious. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Latest posts
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
15 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:30 AM
Draft Talk
R
My double secret probation final mock draft
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 1:04 AM
Draft Talk
2024 Salary Cap as related to Free Agency
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
games in Iowa - Newbie (be gentle, LOL)
Latest: lancer84
Yesterday at 7:38 PM
Introduce Yourself
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Packers - Committed to their own
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top