Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Packers - Committed to their own
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 904665"><p>As mentioned repeatedly I would prefer the Packers to push as much money into the first season Rodgers won't be around anymore as I don't expect the team to be a contender that year anyway.</p><p></p><p>It would allow them to improve the team's chances to win another Super Bowl while he's around though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's true the Packers have several options to create enough cap space to sign their draft class as well as account for #52 and #53 and the practice squad.</p><p></p><p>I just wanted to point out that they need to make a move to get it done.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm well aware that it's solely my opinion and not more valid than any other one. That's true for your take on the situation as well though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers restructuring Rodgers' contract to sign a free agent wouldn't gave made a significant difference regarding their cap situation down the road but signing a veteran with the cap space saved might have improved their chances of winning a Super Bowl in 2021.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You don't hear any talk about other players because none of them is as important to the Packers' success as Rodgers (you even mentioned that in your previous post wondering what happens in case of an injury to him).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once again, I don't care about words. This offseason, the Packers haven't acted as if they're committed to Rodgers long-term.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There are different opinions on the topic out there as well:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://eu.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2021/04/02/green-bay-packers-how-aaron-rodgers-could-force-his-way-out-town/4837930001/" target="_blank">https://eu.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2021/04/02/green-bay-packers-how-aaron-rodgers-could-force-his-way-out-town/4837930001/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The combination of the Packers selecting Love in the first round last year and the unwillingness to restructure Rodgers' contract or guarantee any money left on his current deal strongly indicates the Packers plan on moving on from him before Love's rookie deal is up.</p><p></p><p>As a side note, do you honestly believe Gutekunst selected Love because he thought he was to good to pass up to have him sit on the bench for four years before he leaves town for a compensatory pick???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 904665"] As mentioned repeatedly I would prefer the Packers to push as much money into the first season Rodgers won't be around anymore as I don't expect the team to be a contender that year anyway. It would allow them to improve the team's chances to win another Super Bowl while he's around though. It's true the Packers have several options to create enough cap space to sign their draft class as well as account for #52 and #53 and the practice squad. I just wanted to point out that they need to make a move to get it done. I'm well aware that it's solely my opinion and not more valid than any other one. That's true for your take on the situation as well though. The Packers restructuring Rodgers' contract to sign a free agent wouldn't gave made a significant difference regarding their cap situation down the road but signing a veteran with the cap space saved might have improved their chances of winning a Super Bowl in 2021. You don't hear any talk about other players because none of them is as important to the Packers' success as Rodgers (you even mentioned that in your previous post wondering what happens in case of an injury to him). Once again, I don't care about words. This offseason, the Packers haven't acted as if they're committed to Rodgers long-term. There are different opinions on the topic out there as well: [URL]https://eu.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2021/04/02/green-bay-packers-how-aaron-rodgers-could-force-his-way-out-town/4837930001/[/URL] The combination of the Packers selecting Love in the first round last year and the unwillingness to restructure Rodgers' contract or guarantee any money left on his current deal strongly indicates the Packers plan on moving on from him before Love's rookie deal is up. As a side note, do you honestly believe Gutekunst selected Love because he thought he was to good to pass up to have him sit on the bench for four years before he leaves town for a compensatory pick??? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Today at 7:03 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 6:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Packers - Committed to their own
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
