Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1027711" data-attributes="member: 10086">I agree and even IF we retain Dillon, there’s a need inside 1-2 seasons. Back that up with look what having a dynamic ground game did for Jordan when #33 came back.Meaning we’d better keep that flow going and have a better RB backup plan than Dillon. Just imoAs I’ve said before with Dillon. He’s really a nice tool, but he doesn’t and shouldn’t be relegated to be our starting RB1 if #33 misses time. He’s a short yardage RB and we’d benefit from a few more passes in space. On replaying games it’s glaring to me how Dillon was quite successful  catching the ball in space. We need a Corum or Shipley or Brooks etc. etc. even IF Dillon comes back.If we retain Dillon and we go RB early (call it top125) We only need 1Wilson, Taylor etc. can fight for a PS and primary depth piece if any of those 3 injure.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 558 (members: 0, guests: 558)