Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1001614" data-attributes="member: 7261">Agreed.Unless they find a veteran QB, that is just brought in to help school Love from the sidelines for vet min.  I actually think last season was the first time in a long time, that the Packers had a #2 QB capable of not <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/poop.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":poop:" title="Poop    :poop:" data-shortname=":poop:" />  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/poop.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":poop:" title="Poop    :poop:" data-shortname=":poop:" />  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/poop.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":poop:" title="Poop    :poop:" data-shortname=":poop:" /> the bed if Rodgers went down.  Now is not the time to pay big dollars for a backup, that might be able to win a game here and there.  Bank it and save it for Free Agents next year.I think some people will be surprised as to what they see out of Clifford in Preseason. So much chatter about what a reach he was, when in reality, I think he has more potential than a guy like Hundley had. For the record, Hundley was selected #147 in the 2015 draft, Clifford was the #149th pick this year.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,043 (members: 1, guests: 1,042)