Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 274971" data-attributes="member: 1429">I love Huges, I think he's absolutely a 1st round prospect, and would love to have him.That being said, any draft that doesn't have us taking the LT of the future at the first pick isn't a great draft to me, because I see a huge dropoff from the elite LT prospects and the rest, I don't think we can get the blindside protector in later rounds (chances are we can't. <a href="http://www.jerseyal.com/GBP/?p=123" target="_blank">Should the Green Bay Packers Pick an Offensive Tackle No.1? - Stats say NO! | Jersey Al's Packers Blog</a> . This draft is deeper than usual, so the article IMHO must be adapted, I think we can find the LT at the bottom 1st top 10 2nd.).And also chances are a rookie non-top 10 tackle takes a year to develop.Add that Clifton probably is in his last season, and that we're poised to pick late in 2011 (hopefully last), probabilities are that we won't find the LT of the future next year, and even if we do, we'll have to throw that LT under the fire.We can find a pass rusher, a CB and a S later on. We probably can't find a LT later on...</blockquote>

Total: 687 (members: 4, guests: 683)