Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 999515">Once again, if they felt Love presented them with a better chance of winning they should have made the switch and made it known that Rodgers had a broken thumb much earlier. Obviously they still believed Rodgers was the better option.The Packers nearly making the playoffs because of a four game winning streak strongly suggests it was the correct decision to play Rodgers.As long as the Packers weren't eliminated they played the quarterback providing them with the best chance to win.You took some heat for suggesting to play Love because you didn't care about winning those games. You never suggested Love would present a better option compared to Rodgers playing with a broken thumb.I don't need a quote from MLF, he decided to start Rodgers every single game.You completely misunderstand me voicing a different opinion as not being able to deal with someone disagreeing with me. Just because there are several posters expressing a similar opinion doesn't mean it is any more legit than mine though.That is truly utter nonsense. True, I didn't think Crosby was able to make a 50+ yards field goal anymore. That has absolutely nothing to do with it being common sense that a broken thumb on the throwing hand negatively affects the performance of a quarterback. It's truly mind-boggling anyone would suggest differently.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 80 (members: 0, guests: 80)