Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Firethorn1001" data-source="post: 998825" data-attributes="member: 11511">Doesn't mean they don't have a point.  As I stated, one part possible slippage, one part personality/relationships and one part unknown NFL future in April 2020.I'm surprised more teams don't use better draft capital on backup QBs.  It's an insurance policy to the most important position on the field.  Peoples ******* get all twisted up if the GM uses the wrong level of draft capital as insurance against losing your QB when it is pretty darn important.    Nowadays, with the style of QB play that is out there, probably going to be more important.  I'm not sure some of these QBs play will fall off a cliff pretty quickly in their careers and/or have periods when they are injured.For the record, on draft night, I thought it was a mistake however, after thinking about it, I could see the logic.  Disagreed with it, but could see why.   The further removed we get from draft day and all that has been going on in the public eye between Rodgers and management, there was probably alot going on behind the scenes prior to 2020 for the Packers to make the pick beyond what was going on on the field.</blockquote>

Total: 109 (members: 2, guests: 107)