Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1035757" data-attributes="member: 7261">I guess my feeling about that would be this.  If your offense scores more points than the other team, you win.  If your offense can keep your defense from being on the field less, your defense plays better.  Yes, both of these scenarios work in reverse too (better defense=better offense).Your statement is basically what I have been referring to.  The Packer front office got a little complacent with the Packers offense when it came to receivers.  Why would they do that?  Because as you pointed out, there weren't that many times when they weren't productive. They had a FHOF QB that often made up for lack of receiving talent. However, my feeling is that those Packer teams could have been much better, had they invested more in receivers.  They needed to be the team with the unstoppable offense, not the other way around.</blockquote>

Total: 1,319 (members: 2, guests: 1,317)