Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="thequick12" data-source="post: 1034617" data-attributes="member: 9797">Its my understanding the first numbers they presented to Adams were south of 20 m annually.  Im not sure how far south, I assume not much but thats a lot different than 3 years 70 m.  If they had offered him that he likely wouldn't have been insulted.  As it would have been greater than d hopps 22 m annual avg.  Mind you the big disagreement between the player and the team was...the Packers were claiming d hopps deal averaged only 22 m.  But with his extension the math came out to 28 m a year apprx.</blockquote>

Total: 1,393 (members: 4, guests: 1,389)