Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1015498" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I’d say yes and no. First it’s a false assumption that we’d get 2 “impact” players as Rookies.</p><p>Because it’s a hard sell to say you’ll get 2 impact players in any draft. Especially what you’re going to get as far as immediate impact from Later Day 1 players and beyond. While it’s fine to say anyone is better than developing a QB (and that in a funnel is true) I think it’s a reach to say any other than maybe a top 5 overall at any position is going to tear it up immediately. Reed was a nice surprise, but is he “impact” over option at resigning a veteran?</p><p>Not year 1 imo.</p><p>I suppose you could draft the most starter ready player possible (high floor) but sacrifice long term ceiling in the process.</p><p>My answer does change a little as you get into that top 16 and especially widdling down to a top 5 overall athlete.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1015498, member: 10086"] I’d say yes and no. First it’s a false assumption that we’d get 2 “impact” players as Rookies. Because it’s a hard sell to say you’ll get 2 impact players in any draft. Especially what you’re going to get as far as immediate impact from Later Day 1 players and beyond. While it’s fine to say anyone is better than developing a QB (and that in a funnel is true) I think it’s a reach to say any other than maybe a top 5 overall at any position is going to tear it up immediately. Reed was a nice surprise, but is he “impact” over option at resigning a veteran? Not year 1 imo. I suppose you could draft the most starter ready player possible (high floor) but sacrifice long term ceiling in the process. My answer does change a little as you get into that top 16 and especially widdling down to a top 5 overall athlete. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
El Guapo
melvin dangerr
Pkrjones
Latest posts
NFC North Draft Review (2025)
Latest: Calebs Revenge
40 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Mediocre punters from da past and other things....
Latest: Calebs Revenge
42 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Calebs Revenge
50 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 8:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: DoURant
Today at 6:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top