Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1012164" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>[ATTACH=full]19598[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19599[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19600[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19601[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19602[/ATTACH]</p><p>[USER=11410]@U.P. Packfan[/USER]</p><p>I’m not an expert by any means, but I’m not a novice to Football. I’ve got more hours logged watching than some people have breathing. So I respectfully disagree. Reed was already slowing down to find the hole and he had clear Safety coverage over the top. A longer throw is an incompletion best case or possibly INT by the crossing Safety help.</p><p></p><p>These 5 catchable balls resulted in</p><p>0 catches. Btw the 20 yard strike on that sideline was caught. If he’s such a bad passer how did the WR catch it?? It was ruled in bounds and a +20 yard catch for a 1st Down. Instead it was reversed to a -10 because Walker left his post (almost gave up a sack that Jordan nicely dodged Walker was then seen was found running 10 yards past LOS all by himself and drew a flag.</p><p></p><p>The one inside the MN5 was a strike. Maybe Dutch because he didn’t lead him.. but 90% catchable. It was clearly dropped and in stride. It was an automatic 1st down from the MN3 worse case and potentially a TD. That was likely 7 points we lost there.</p><p></p><p>The Watson miss was Harrison draping on him before the ball arrives. Harrison makes contact before the ball even reaches him and #9 is being pulled backwards here That’s called Pass interference but sometimes it gets missed, so that’s fine. But let’s not pretend Love underthrows it either.</p><p></p><p>These aren’t even all the examples in just 1 game in missed opportunities that were not on Love. Yet they resulted in</p><p></p><p>Punt </p><p></p><p>-30 yard exchange. He caught a +20 and we went -10</p><p></p><p>-a dropped TD</p><p></p><p>- a dropped 1st down (Musgrave was clearly being held just zoom in.</p><p></p><p>- INT</p><p></p><p>All 5 were catchable passes but crushed Loves Numbers. Even then Love threw 60% which is respectable. What would it have been it 2 or 3 get caught?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1012164, member: 10086"] [ATTACH type="full" alt="IMG_6055.png"]19598[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full" alt="IMG_6020.png"]19599[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full" alt="IMG_6036.png"]19600[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full" alt="IMG_6046.png"]19601[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full" alt="IMG_6049.png"]19602[/ATTACH] [USER=11410]@U.P. Packfan[/USER] I’m not an expert by any means, but I’m not a novice to Football. I’ve got more hours logged watching than some people have breathing. So I respectfully disagree. Reed was already slowing down to find the hole and he had clear Safety coverage over the top. A longer throw is an incompletion best case or possibly INT by the crossing Safety help. These 5 catchable balls resulted in 0 catches. Btw the 20 yard strike on that sideline was caught. If he’s such a bad passer how did the WR catch it?? It was ruled in bounds and a +20 yard catch for a 1st Down. Instead it was reversed to a -10 because Walker left his post (almost gave up a sack that Jordan nicely dodged Walker was then seen was found running 10 yards past LOS all by himself and drew a flag. The one inside the MN5 was a strike. Maybe Dutch because he didn’t lead him.. but 90% catchable. It was clearly dropped and in stride. It was an automatic 1st down from the MN3 worse case and potentially a TD. That was likely 7 points we lost there. The Watson miss was Harrison draping on him before the ball arrives. Harrison makes contact before the ball even reaches him and #9 is being pulled backwards here That’s called Pass interference but sometimes it gets missed, so that’s fine. But let’s not pretend Love underthrows it either. These aren’t even all the examples in just 1 game in missed opportunities that were not on Love. Yet they resulted in Punt -30 yard exchange. He caught a +20 and we went -10 -a dropped TD - a dropped 1st down (Musgrave was clearly being held just zoom in. - INT All 5 were catchable passes but crushed Loves Numbers. Even then Love threw 60% which is respectable. What would it have been it 2 or 3 get caught? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 8:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: sschind
Yesterday at 7:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
OTAs
Latest: sschind
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Shareholders meeting 2024?
Latest: Cheese Meister
Yesterday at 7:02 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 2:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top