Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 1000838" data-attributes="member: 10441">again, he was specifically talking about the team that got destroyed by the Vikings in an embarassing home loss 30 something to 10's of somethings.  THAT team was not a super bowl team.  The team GB put on the field the season before Rodgers was drafted.  not the 2010 team who was clearly much better on paper and when it counted.  One old and declining in need of reset, the other ascending and young.  as evidenced by their respective following seasons.  One team mustered 4 wins, the other was again a super bowl favorite with 15 wins.  There are vast differences between the 04 and the '10 team Sunshine wasn't comparing them.  It was the season before Love was drafted vs the team before Rodgers was drafted.a roster that goes 10-6 early exit then 4- and whatever is a poor roster, a roster in need of change vs a team that wins 13, they draft a replacement and goes 13 wins in the next 2 seasons.  That is what was being compared.  Everyone should keep that in mind.There is the consistent presence that introduces something into an argument or debate then completely moves on from the point they themselves were making to try and throw shade at someone who effectively refutes it.Sunshines entire point was the season before Rodgers was drafted was not a super bowl caliber team.  not that 10-6 teams an not be super bowl caliber teams</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 85 (members: 0, guests: 85)