Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 1000450" data-attributes="member: 2846">Once again, you were not correct that Love was a reach, or that there was no need for the selection.NFLN - yesterday (paraphrase)'The selection of Love paid huge dividends to the Packers. Rodgers had been declining in performance and attitude, and the perceived slight of selecting his replacement, put that draft day slight chip back on his shoulder and the Packers got another 3 good years out of him.'And the guy wasn't being controversial or quirky, they were talking as if this is generally understood by most. Except the most ardent Rodgers devotees, I suppose.</blockquote>

Total: 62 (members: 2, guests: 60)