Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Ground Game?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="toolkien" data-source="post: 450193" data-attributes="member: 4637"><p>Who wouldn't want to see every position be as good as it can be? But everything comes at a cost. You want more potency here or there, that means less potency somewhere else. Every team gets the same colleges, free agents, and a $120,000,000 to spend. Every team has a philosophy. If anyone has ever played roulette you've got a whole board to lay your chips out on. You can go heavier on red or heavier on black, or odd or even. The rest is luck (assuming it's not rigged). If you lay evenly on each red/black/odd/even you might as well go watch the grass grow. The Packers have decided to skew offense, and within that philosophy they've skewed pass. Any place you see as thin, they saw as thin 6 months to a year before you did and it was planned that way. They just play the luck game that they won't get hit where they are thin while where they were intentionally thick they can get a compounded return. </p><p> </p><p>The Packers have had the best team in the league the last three years combined. Their philosophy has worked, and they've been undone only by turning the ball over in the 2009 and 2011 playoffs. If that's not good enough, then maybe some would prefer a team loaded at running back and defense that survives by controlling the clock and limiting the other team to 12 pts per game. Of course when that D decides to give up 28 or 31 pts in a playoff game, then the complaints will be why the Packers can't have a 49ers of the 80's offense. And anyone who thinks that any team should be able to crack off a potent AND balanced team hasn't been paying attention the last several years. It's been rare the last 10-12 years, and getting rarer. Potent and skewed is the order of the day for league leading regular season teams.</p><p> </p><p>You establish a philosophy and you lay out your chips and you let the wheel spin. If you fail to follow your plan in the playoffs, regardless of how you construct it, don't expect to win it all. In the last 12 years, 9 Super Bowls have been won by teams who won the playoff turnover margin. The other 3 were won by the team #2 in turnover margin. And those championships were won by teams skewed to their offense, or skewed to their defense, and a few by balanced and mediocre teams. But they followed their plan and they didn't turn the ball over. But those who lost simply can't retool their philosophy every year because it failed, especially if that philosophy works and comes undone by uncharacteristic turnovers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="toolkien, post: 450193, member: 4637"] Who wouldn't want to see every position be as good as it can be? But everything comes at a cost. You want more potency here or there, that means less potency somewhere else. Every team gets the same colleges, free agents, and a $120,000,000 to spend. Every team has a philosophy. If anyone has ever played roulette you've got a whole board to lay your chips out on. You can go heavier on red or heavier on black, or odd or even. The rest is luck (assuming it's not rigged). If you lay evenly on each red/black/odd/even you might as well go watch the grass grow. The Packers have decided to skew offense, and within that philosophy they've skewed pass. Any place you see as thin, they saw as thin 6 months to a year before you did and it was planned that way. They just play the luck game that they won't get hit where they are thin while where they were intentionally thick they can get a compounded return. The Packers have had the best team in the league the last three years combined. Their philosophy has worked, and they've been undone only by turning the ball over in the 2009 and 2011 playoffs. If that's not good enough, then maybe some would prefer a team loaded at running back and defense that survives by controlling the clock and limiting the other team to 12 pts per game. Of course when that D decides to give up 28 or 31 pts in a playoff game, then the complaints will be why the Packers can't have a 49ers of the 80's offense. And anyone who thinks that any team should be able to crack off a potent AND balanced team hasn't been paying attention the last several years. It's been rare the last 10-12 years, and getting rarer. Potent and skewed is the order of the day for league leading regular season teams. You establish a philosophy and you lay out your chips and you let the wheel spin. If you fail to follow your plan in the playoffs, regardless of how you construct it, don't expect to win it all. In the last 12 years, 9 Super Bowls have been won by teams who won the playoff turnover margin. The other 3 were won by the team #2 in turnover margin. And those championships were won by teams skewed to their offense, or skewed to their defense, and a few by balanced and mediocre teams. But they followed their plan and they didn't turn the ball over. But those who lost simply can't retool their philosophy every year because it failed, especially if that philosophy works and comes undone by uncharacteristic turnovers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:03 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Cap Projections and changes
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
2026 Draft Rd 6 #35 K Trey Smack Florida
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:31 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Ground Game?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top