1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

"The Fumble"

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Eli Haugen, Dec 14, 2014.

  1. Eli Haugen

    Eli Haugen Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,532
    Ratings:
    +255
    Ok......... now say What? Ummmmmm Inside 2 minutes, a fumble inside the 20 cannot be recovered and advanced by anone other than the player who fumbled. Or the ball is spotted at the spot of the recovery? Safety?

    When did football become congress. Rules changing while we sleep? Lacy recovered it, and got forward progress out of the endzone IMO...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. red4tribe

    red4tribe Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    944
    Ratings:
    +437
    This has been a rule for a while. I've seen the same call numerous times. The refs made the right call, we got beat by a great Buffalo defense today.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. gatorpack

    gatorpack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    715
    Ratings:
    +171
    It was the right call, but I still dont get the rule. We deserved to lose today anyway.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. Ceodore

    Ceodore Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2011
    Messages:
    510
    Ratings:
    +212
    its to prevent the fumbling team from advancing the ball via fumble. cant just call it sometimes and not others obviously.
     
  5. Eli Haugen

    Eli Haugen Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,532
    Ratings:
    +255
    the ball didnt advance as a fumble... I dont like the rule. someone kicks it out of the endzone, then yea, you cant advance the ball that way. Spotted in the endzone and a safety. Our fumble went backwards and Lacy picked it up before advancing forward.... There is a difference...
     
  6. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,809
    Ratings:
    +3,747
    Lacy did not get out of the end zone anyway. The entire ball must cross the goal line to avoid a safety.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Raptorman

    Raptorman Vikings fan since 1966.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    2,595
    Ratings:
    +1,005
    One of the reasons for the rule.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fumble
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. melvin dangerr

    melvin dangerr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Messages:
    543
    Ratings:
    +135
    Lacy was stopped at the 1foot line.......
     
  9. adambr2

    adambr2 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,792
    Ratings:
    +2,175
  10. Twiddlemylobes

    Twiddlemylobes Fat Tuesday Orleans

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    1,112
    Ratings:
    +522
    Its a bogus rule.. politicians have worked their way in every facet of society.. we cant flush our toilet without worrying about being in compliance. Anyone else notice it's hard to find a regular 100 watt light bulb?
     
  11. adambr2

    adambr2 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,792
    Ratings:
    +2,175
    Again...the rule is a red herring. There's no angle you can watch to say that Lacy got the ball 100% out of the end zone and they never ruled he did.

    Rule or no rule it's a safety.

    I actually find it a lot more annoying that we can't kick off a tee after that and we had to settle for that pathetic onside punt attempt.
     
  12. AKCheese

    AKCheese Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    319
    Ratings:
    +146
    Why would anyone want an antique 100 watt light bulb?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. GoPGo

    GoPGo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,862
    Ratings:
    +845
    We got beat by ourselves today. Rodgers had time. Lacy averaged 6.5 yards per carry. Nelson dropped a probable TD. Adams looked completely lost (that's been the case the past 3 weeks though).

    What strikes me as funny is how people are willing to label the Bills defense as "great" but they will say ours is mediocre or even bad. Our defense outplayed theirs today.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Daryl Muellenberg

    Daryl Muellenberg Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    207
    Ratings:
    +52
    No, the ball has to be completely out of the end zone otherwise it is a safety. Have you ever seen the ball spotted on the goal line? Never.

    From the nfl rule book defining a safety: Two points are scored for the opposing team when the ball is dead on or behind a team’s own goal line.

    Note that it says "on or behind the goal line", not just behind.
     
  15. 7thFloorRA

    7thFloorRA Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,266
    Ratings:
    +1,075
    Why can't they simply follow the rule where you can not advance the ball via a FORWARD fumble. Doubt it would have mattered but I don't like the rule.
     
  16. Daryl Muellenberg

    Daryl Muellenberg Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    207
    Ratings:
    +52
    I don't like the rule either. I can understand not allowing to advance a forward fumble, but if it's backwards, why not? The only reason to not allow it is to prevent the offense from having an advantage and how in the world can there be an advantage if the ball is fumbled backwards? With that logic, then they shouldn't allow a lateral to be advanced in the final 2 minutes either.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. GoPGo

    GoPGo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,862
    Ratings:
    +845
    Or a pitch for that matter. I absolutely hate how litigious the NFL rulebook has become. I wish they would just chuck it in the fire and dust off the 1994 rulebook and go with that. That seemed to be the time when the rules struck just about the right balance. The only thing I would keep since then would be getting rid of the "would have been in bounds if the receiver wasn't shoved" rule.
     
  18. adambr2

    adambr2 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,792
    Ratings:
    +2,175
    No, it doesn't. All the ball has to do is break the plane of your own goal line and it's a safety. Just like on the other end scoring a TD.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,706
    Ratings:
    +6,657
    While the running game was working and our receivers dropped some balls the Bills pass defense was amazing. Give some credit when it´s due.
     
  20. MichiganSportsTalk

    MichiganSportsTalk Lions fan for longer than I can remember

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2014
    Messages:
    81
    Ratings:
    +47
    Turbo charge an E-Z Bake Oven?
     
  21. Eli Haugen

    Eli Haugen Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,532
    Ratings:
    +255
    The Bills secondary was given a free pass yesterday. They were getting there early. Remember when Quarless went up and over the defender, and at the last second had it knocked out? He ran into Quarless with both hands up, and slightly turned his head sideways(looking for the ball?) Meanwhile Quarless has to go up and over him to get to the ball???? WTH!!!!!!!!!!!! Jordy got mugged a few times. But the biggest was the 2nd int when (Adams i think) got hit and wrapped up 2 steps before the ball got there. Couldnt get his hands up, and ball bounced off him up in the air. Or Cobb in the endzone? They had illegal contact first. THEN blatant interferance. I can only assume they considered it uncatchable? It wouldnt have been uncatchable if they didnt pinball him through his route...It happened all night. Rodgers started in the first half complaining. By the second half he just accepted there was no rules for the secondary today...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. TJV

    TJV Lifelong Packers Fanatic

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5,389
    Ratings:
    +4,176
    Wrong thread but:

    Duds: The OP complaining about a rule changing while he slept when it’s been around for over 30 years. And the OP and others ignoring the fact that Lacy didn’t get out of the EZ anyway.

    Packers fans complaining about the officiating. While there were some bad calls and non-calls that’s not why the Packers lost the game. One of the, if not the most accurate passer in NFL history was inaccurate. Receivers compounded that problem by dropping catchable balls. The punt team allowed a long PR for TD. The Packers had yet another kick blocked. Rodgers had the ball knocked away into the EZ. None of that was on the officials.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  23. Sky King

    Sky King Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,541
    Ratings:
    +968
    People who would prefer not to use Chinese made compact florescent bulbs that could eventually contaminate landfills and groundwater with mercury.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. GoPGo

    GoPGo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,862
    Ratings:
    +845
    Yes, someone else already said that. Thank you for repeating him.
     
  25. Slayer Dude

    Slayer Dude Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6
    But we have to blame it on something else other than the mighty Packers performance. The officiating seems like a good place to start.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page