Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Falcons Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaliforniaCheez" data-source="post: 29957" data-attributes="member: 167"><p>The most effective argument for Vick when it comes to Sunday's game is he alters the defensive game plan and forces the defense to prepare differently and react to his "mobility". </p><p></p><p>The traditional approach is the "spy" linebacker. That is not effective if the "spy" gets faked and misses a tackle. Therefore the a containment type of scheme has to be employed. It requires good CB's in man to man coverage. This will be a rare form of defense for the Packers. I would assume that the Falcon's divisional opponents are more effective at it having practiced it more. A TE can help but Crumpler is averaging only 1 catch per quarter. </p><p></p><p>When Falcons are on Offense: </p><p></p><p>Yards/Game 14th..........Packer Defense 9th</p><p>Yards/Play 13th (T).......Packer Defense 12th</p><p>Passing 28th................Packer Defense 12th </p><p>Rushing 1st..................Packer Defense 13th</p><p></p><p>It would appear that it favors the team with the lead. </p><p></p><p>When the Packers are on Offense: </p><p></p><p>Yards/Game 17th..........Falcons Defense 22nd </p><p>Yards/Play 13th (T).......Falcons Defense 18th </p><p>Passing 5th..................Falcons Defense 17th </p><p>Rushing 30th................Falcons Defense 18th </p><p></p><p>Packers will be more prone to pass which is riskier and possible lower time of possesion. The Falcons may have trouble protecting a lead. </p><p></p><p>The Packers average 21 points a game and allow 20. </p><p>The Falcons average 24 points a game and allow 18. </p><p></p><p>The Falcons have 24 more points scored than the Packers.</p><p>The Falcons have allowed 19 more points than the Packers. </p><p></p><p>It looks like it will be a close game. Nothing new to Packer fans who know their average loss is by 5.7 points. The difference will be some intangible or a kick, or a turnover. The Packers really need an early lead for a victory.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaliforniaCheez, post: 29957, member: 167"] The most effective argument for Vick when it comes to Sunday's game is he alters the defensive game plan and forces the defense to prepare differently and react to his "mobility". The traditional approach is the "spy" linebacker. That is not effective if the "spy" gets faked and misses a tackle. Therefore the a containment type of scheme has to be employed. It requires good CB's in man to man coverage. This will be a rare form of defense for the Packers. I would assume that the Falcon's divisional opponents are more effective at it having practiced it more. A TE can help but Crumpler is averaging only 1 catch per quarter. When Falcons are on Offense: Yards/Game 14th..........Packer Defense 9th Yards/Play 13th (T).......Packer Defense 12th Passing 28th................Packer Defense 12th Rushing 1st..................Packer Defense 13th It would appear that it favors the team with the lead. When the Packers are on Offense: Yards/Game 17th..........Falcons Defense 22nd Yards/Play 13th (T).......Falcons Defense 18th Passing 5th..................Falcons Defense 17th Rushing 30th................Falcons Defense 18th Packers will be more prone to pass which is riskier and possible lower time of possesion. The Falcons may have trouble protecting a lead. The Packers average 21 points a game and allow 20. The Falcons average 24 points a game and allow 18. The Falcons have 24 more points scored than the Packers. The Falcons have allowed 19 more points than the Packers. It looks like it will be a close game. Nothing new to Packer fans who know their average loss is by 5.7 points. The difference will be some intangible or a kick, or a turnover. The Packers really need an early lead for a victory. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
The General
Latest posts
Da Bears new head coach!!!!!
Latest: lambeaulambo
Yesterday at 9:12 PM
NFL Discussions
Post Draft/UDFA/Off-Season Signings - Each Position Trade Block
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 8:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Prospects Deciding NOT to declare...
Latest: scheeler
Yesterday at 7:20 PM
Draft Talk
Is it time?
Latest: Sanguine camper
Yesterday at 7:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:02 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Falcons Game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
