Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 911036" data-attributes="member: 10086">I chose the only example I need. SF is a team that functions in similar capacity to GB (actually technically vice versa)  and has had recent success. More success than GB with a lesser QB.SF smothered KC in the regular season 2019.  They then went 13-3 and beat us down like a dog if you recall?  That was Aaron Rodgers who had a meltdown. They were being kind to allow 20 points and that game was over by quarter before the 4th quarter started. The score never fully represented how outmatched we were. SF didn’t even throw the ball was it like 8-10 times and we were a #2 seed!  That’s embarrassing and yes I watched that game and it was awful. I’m a Packer fan but that doesn’t mean I need to conceal the truth when asked.SF then went on to the SB and led 20-10 until well into quarter 4! It wasn’t the SF QB to blame for allowing 2 TD’s inside 6 minutes.  They came very close to SB champions with a far lesser QB than Rodgers.I never said QB wasn't important. I’ve argued the importance of the QB position many times. But there’s more ways to skin a cat in the format of a MLF game type philosophy. Having a balanced team (leaning Defense if anything) is more important than a lopsided Team.You sidestepped the question. A simple yes or no is fineIs Garoppolo a great QB?</blockquote>

Total: 53 (members: 2, guests: 51)