Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 979234" data-attributes="member: 17987">I think the point is that it doesn't have to be an either-or. Like, we can say the team was wrong to keep putting him out on punt returns (and they were) but that doesn't somehow mean they should have instead been playing him more at WR or giving him more reps there. Being poor in one area doesn't mean we can assume he would've succeeded in another given more reps there.What is more likely is that he was a bad fit for returning punts in the NFL (as you said) AND a bad fit for playing WR in the NFL. Maybe the team shouldn't have kept trying him out back there on punts (I've said as much too) but that doesn't mean they were in the wrong for not giving him more reps at WR, either. Think the simplest and most likely explanation is that he simply wasn't good enough for either and that's not on the club.</blockquote>

Total: 116 (members: 3, guests: 113)