Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 954280" data-attributes="member: 9033">This is the part I don't get. I trust that the guy who is better at his job than literally anyone else in the world knows what he's doing. Further, I will tend to look at things in a favorable light for that person; in this case it just tells me that the other receivers weren't reliable/good enough to earn that target share. The blame gets put on Rodgers for something that should really be blamed on the other receivers and, even more so, on Gute for not getting other players on the team that could earn those targets.Basically, I don't get the idea that the 5th round WR was certifiably more deserving of targets just because Rodgers threw the ball to Adams so much. Just because a 5th rounf WR was the 2nd best receiver on the team doesn't detract from the fact that he was still a day 3 pick and it's EXTREMELY rare for those guys to amount to much in the NFL.I get that the Packers played well without Adams which says a lot about the coaches but saying the offense was not as good without Adams because Rodgers was forced to pass to sub-par receivers is a logic I just can't get behind.</blockquote>

Total: 1,021 (members: 2, guests: 1,019)