Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 954261" data-attributes="member: 12283">Well I would never want to rob a guy of a good baffling, but it turns out that these two ideas aren't contradictory.Adams was head and shoulders the best target on the team, so it made sense that he would lead the team in targets by a wide margin. I've never seen or heard of anyone blaming Rodgers for targeting Adams more than everyone else. But Rodgers still over-did it at times to the detriment of the entire offense, and that would explain why the offense was still strong without Adams-- spreading the ball around within the context of the scheme proved very effective.</blockquote>

Total: 997 (members: 2, guests: 995)