Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Adams Poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 953959" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>I don't know who those fans are, but in my post that you're quoting I gave actual numbers. The %'s would be 32% of pass attempts and 34% of completions. To put those numbers in some context, here are a few comps:</p><p></p><p>TB: 18% and 20%</p><p>BUF: 25% and 25%</p><p>KC: 24% and 25%</p><p></p><p>To your second comment, let me just say that I agree that if the season started today, and Rodgers' top receivers were Allen Lazard, Randall Cobb, and Amari Rodgers, I would not argue that spreading targets would be enough to keep them at an elite level for an entire season. They have to add quality options to the offense. My argument is that a variety of <em>quality </em>options has proven and could continue to prove more effective that a single elite option soaking up an outsized amount of offensive focus and making the offense more predictable than it ought to be. Bear in mind that the entire philosophy of this offense is to avoid predictability. </p><p></p><p>Say, just hypothetically, they traded for Tyler Lockett, re-signed MVS, and then drafted a receiver in rounds 1 and 2. </p><p></p><p>A receiving corps of Lockett, MVS, rookie, Lazard, and Cobb, plus the options at RB and TE could absolutely result in a more effective passing game than they had with Adams on the roster, especially if Rodgers doesn't start hyper-focusing on any one of those players. </p><p></p><p>As far as the playoffs go, I don't really see why we would assume we need an elite receiver to win tough playoff games when we've had that elite receiver for the last three postseasons and it didn't amount to anything.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 953959, member: 12283"] I don't know who those fans are, but in my post that you're quoting I gave actual numbers. The %'s would be 32% of pass attempts and 34% of completions. To put those numbers in some context, here are a few comps: TB: 18% and 20% BUF: 25% and 25% KC: 24% and 25% To your second comment, let me just say that I agree that if the season started today, and Rodgers' top receivers were Allen Lazard, Randall Cobb, and Amari Rodgers, I would not argue that spreading targets would be enough to keep them at an elite level for an entire season. They have to add quality options to the offense. My argument is that a variety of [I]quality [/I]options has proven and could continue to prove more effective that a single elite option soaking up an outsized amount of offensive focus and making the offense more predictable than it ought to be. Bear in mind that the entire philosophy of this offense is to avoid predictability. Say, just hypothetically, they traded for Tyler Lockett, re-signed MVS, and then drafted a receiver in rounds 1 and 2. A receiving corps of Lockett, MVS, rookie, Lazard, and Cobb, plus the options at RB and TE could absolutely result in a more effective passing game than they had with Adams on the roster, especially if Rodgers doesn't start hyper-focusing on any one of those players. As far as the playoffs go, I don't really see why we would assume we need an elite receiver to win tough playoff games when we've had that elite receiver for the last three postseasons and it didn't amount to anything. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
Poppa San
U.P. Packfan
XPack
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Poppa San
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
47 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
48 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: OldSchool101
56 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Adams Poll
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top