Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 953892">Just for the record, the Packers could have afforded to re-sign Douglas and Tonyan if they had extended Adams using a similar structure as the Raiders did.That might have been a decent idea if the Packers didn't make every other move this offseason to indicate they're going all-in for next season.The Packers can't trade Rodgers this offseason as they would take a massive additional cap hit because of it.While Rodgers targeted Adams at a higher percentage compared to most other quarterback/receiver tandems a lot of fans make it sound like he did it on 70% of the passing attempts.Don't get me wrong, I truly hope the Packers can keep it up without Adams for an entire season but I'm not convinced Rodgers spreading the ball around will work for an entire season with a subpar receiving corps.I have a hard time believing the Packers' chances improve of winning those tough playoff games without an elite receiver.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 97 (members: 0, guests: 97)