Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Aaron Rodgers performance thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rmontro" data-source="post: 877474" data-attributes="member: 12340"><p>No doubt the better receivers will have more likelihood of producing a more positive result. But here's where the question comes in. </p><p></p><p>If a play is designed for the QB to go through his reads, there's maybe a #1 option, and a #2 option, and a #3. If #1 and #2 are not open, do you throw it to #3? Coach says throw it to #3, that's how the play is designed. But uh oh, what if I don't trust the receiver who is the third option? Maybe I skip him and go back to #1, but oops he's still covered. Should I run around the backfield a little until someone else hopefully comes open? I guess if you're Brett Favre fire it in there whether the guy is double covered or not (hey, it's just a joke - sort of). But no one comes open so it ends up I get sacked or throw it away. </p><p></p><p>Coach says "Why didn't you throw it to #3? He was open." Well, I don't trust him. Besides, I excel at improvising plays. Well, maybe not this time, but usually. </p><p></p><p>Okay, if the QB doesn't trust the guy, why is he on the field as the third option? Maybe the guy ahead of him got injured, not much you can do about that. Do you go with the scheme or go with who you trust?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rmontro, post: 877474, member: 12340"] No doubt the better receivers will have more likelihood of producing a more positive result. But here's where the question comes in. If a play is designed for the QB to go through his reads, there's maybe a #1 option, and a #2 option, and a #3. If #1 and #2 are not open, do you throw it to #3? Coach says throw it to #3, that's how the play is designed. But uh oh, what if I don't trust the receiver who is the third option? Maybe I skip him and go back to #1, but oops he's still covered. Should I run around the backfield a little until someone else hopefully comes open? I guess if you're Brett Favre fire it in there whether the guy is double covered or not (hey, it's just a joke - sort of). But no one comes open so it ends up I get sacked or throw it away. Coach says "Why didn't you throw it to #3? He was open." Well, I don't trust him. Besides, I excel at improvising plays. Well, maybe not this time, but usually. Okay, if the QB doesn't trust the guy, why is he on the field as the third option? Maybe the guy ahead of him got injured, not much you can do about that. Do you go with the scheme or go with who you trust? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
PackerDNA
cowpie
Latest posts
Projecting Jordan Love in 2024
Latest: AmishMafia
Today at 7:31 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:04 AM
College Sports
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 6:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 8:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: Half Empty
Yesterday at 4:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Aaron Rodgers performance thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top