Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackAttack12" data-source="post: 821382" data-attributes="member: 11933">Involved in pulling the trigger and deciding to hire LaFleur? No. Given a heads up prior to the decision being made? Yes.The same thing they could have done regarding Van Pelt. What's the difference?This is all that I am saying. On certain decisions that are made, Rodgers should absolutely be in the know. The decision regarding Jordy? I'm fine with Rodgers not knowing. The decision regarding his position coach? He should have absolutely been in the know.All I'm saying is that, the extent to which Rodgers was involved in the process with LaFleur is more than proper, and essential in my opinion.</blockquote>

Total: 110 (members: 3, guests: 107)