Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 3-4 D-Line...better? or worse?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aaronqb" data-source="post: 284505" data-attributes="member: 2237"><p><strong>I believe the Packer staff made the decision to go 3-4 because they think the system is better than the 4-3 for today's offenses - not because their existing personnel after the 2008 season was better suited to the 3-4.</strong> Once they decided on the 3-4 system, they began acquiring the players that perform best in it. Jenkins and Kampman are both better suited to the 4-3 than the 3-4 and I'm sure the Packer brass expected that not all the existing players from 2008 would be able to adapt to the 3-4. </p><p></p><p>However, now that they are into the 3-4, they are now drafting different types of players than they did two years ago. Matthews and Brad Jones are perfect fits in the 3-4; they may not have been in a 4-3. We'll know more about how well Raji fits this year, especially now that he will playing NT. If they are correct that the 3-4 is a superior system, then we should expect the Packer defense to improve as they continue to acquire the right guys for the system - such as Mike Neal, CJ Wilson.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aaronqb, post: 284505, member: 2237"] [B]I believe the Packer staff made the decision to go 3-4 because they think the system is better than the 4-3 for today's offenses - not because their existing personnel after the 2008 season was better suited to the 3-4.[/B] Once they decided on the 3-4 system, they began acquiring the players that perform best in it. Jenkins and Kampman are both better suited to the 4-3 than the 3-4 and I'm sure the Packer brass expected that not all the existing players from 2008 would be able to adapt to the 3-4. However, now that they are into the 3-4, they are now drafting different types of players than they did two years ago. Matthews and Brad Jones are perfect fits in the 3-4; they may not have been in a 4-3. We'll know more about how well Raji fits this year, especially now that he will playing NT. If they are correct that the 3-4 is a superior system, then we should expect the Packer defense to improve as they continue to acquire the right guys for the system - such as Mike Neal, CJ Wilson. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
AKCheese
Latest posts
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
49 minutes ago
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:40 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 8:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 7:44 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 3-4 D-Line...better? or worse?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top