sixone220 said:
we must go by different rules then because i could have sworn that a helmet to helmet hit was illegal.
how was he thrown off by the muff? was he already in mid dive when it happened? he knew what he was doing. when i say it was intentional, i don't mean that he said, ok i'm going to lead with my helmet and hit his helmet, but he did knowingly dive head first and he has to be held accountable for his actions because of the result.
same thing as last yr, darius didn't mean to clothsline fergy in the head, but he did put out his arm to hit him. he hit him in the head because of that decision.
As one of your own posters has said, Murphy started to curl down. Davis was running low, which would have been a hit to the chest, but when Murphy curled down, it put Murphy's helmet at the same level with Davis' helmet and they collided. (I've watched the video of it about 4 times) And in this type of hit,
no, helmet to helmet is
NOT an illegal hit because Murphy was the ball carrier. Even the analyst mentioned that fact when it happened.
Here are the illegal types of helmet to helmet hits.
The NFL penalizes defensive players who use the facemask, crown or any one of the four "hit points" on the helmet to strike a specific player under one of six "defenseless" conditions: a quarterback in the act of throwing; a wide receiver in the act of catching; a punt returner in the act of catching; a player who is down (spearing); a running back who is in the grasp of a defender and has lost his forward momentum or has stopped; and a quarterback on change of possession (fumble/interception).
As you can see, none of these apply to Murphy. He was not under "defenseless" conditions. He was the ball carrier, running in forward motion when they collided.
I'm sorry that in your opinion it was illegal. But in the NFL's opinion it wasn't, and that's all that really counts.