1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Ted has a reason to sign free agents today

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by ivo610, May 12, 2015.

  1. ivo610

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    16,590
    Ratings:
    +4,273
    Being may 12th, teams now can sign FAs without impacting their comp picks. (At least that's my understanding).

    Are there any FAs out there currently you would like to see Ted sign?
     
  2. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,589
    Ratings:
    +6,582
    Brandon Spikes
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Pokerbrat2000

    Pokerbrat2000 Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    4,641
    Ratings:
    +2,874
    Spikes was rumored early in FA process as a good fit in GB, so it surprises me that they haven't had him in for a visit.

    One can only conclude that TT doesn't see him as a good fit/value or Spikes doesn't want to play in GB.
     
  4. Mondio

    Mondio Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,795
    Ratings:
    +1,756
    there are a bunch of other teams that don't seem to have a ton of interest in him either
     
  5. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,589
    Ratings:
    +6,582
    He has had some visits including with the Vikings and the Patriots but it seems he´s still asking for too much money.
     
  6. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,753
    Ratings:
    +3,691
    He visited the Pats?! After tweeting that his first 4 years in the league at New England were "four years a slave"?

    I guess nobody wanting to meet his contract demands changed his outlook.
     
  7. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,589
    Ratings:
    +6,582
  8. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,753
    Ratings:
    +3,691
  9. Sunshinepacker

    Sunshinepacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,907
    Ratings:
    +730
    I've always been reluctant to believe that Ted avoids signing free agents because they might cost him the 210th pick in the draft. It doesn't make sense to go into free agency and think, "hey this guy might help this year but he could cost me a fifth round pick NEXT year so I can draft a player with a 20% chance of making an impact in three years." (and yes, I'm aware the 210th pick is in the sixth round, I just used fifth round as an example)
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  10. Pokerbrat2000

    Pokerbrat2000 Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    4,641
    Ratings:
    +2,874
    Let's face it, Ted's shoes squeak when he blinks......not saying that is a bad thing. :coffee:
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2015
    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. sschind

    sschind Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    997
    Ratings:
    +498

    Add to that the fact he has said it doesn't factor in his decision and I have a tendency to agree with you. Not that Ted is always all that forthcoming when it comes to matters such as this.

    If Ted thinks the guy will improve the team and can be signed for the right price he will sign him and not worry about losing the comp pick next year.
     
  12. rodell330

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,510
    Ratings:
    +1,282
    He has as REASON to sign few agents every yr but he doesn't. He will overpay for one of his guys vs signing free agents.. Thats a FACT.
     
  13. Mondio

    Mondio Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,795
    Ratings:
    +1,756
    yeah, what an idiot. We could let Nelson, Cobb and Bulaga walk and sign a Suh. Great deal?!?!
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  14. Vrill

    Vrill Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,782
    Ratings:
    +828
    Patriots released CB Kyle Arrington..I know we drafted a lot of DB's...but first thing I thought about when I seen him released, was that is a TT type signing. He's also a boundary CB.
     
  15. rodell330

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,510
    Ratings:
    +1,282
    That's not what I meant.. Those were good signings but what do you say a out Hawk, And Burnett!?
     
  16. Carl

    Carl Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2013
    Messages:
    2,766
    Ratings:
    +1,908
    Did you miss Burnett's play last year? He played up to contract if not better.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,589
    Ratings:
    +6,582
    I´m not sure about that. The Packers still don´t have any depth at the position.

    Arrington mostly played in the slot last season and doesn´t have the talent to start on the outside. Not interested in him at all.
     
  18. tynimiller

    tynimiller Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    1,073
    Ratings:
    +331
    Hawk was an expensive 2 down LB...but he was also one of the steadiest 2 down LBs. For that same money it'd been nice to grab a true 3 down backer but if I remember right there wasn't one available for that same contract.
     
  19. El Guapo

    El Guapo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,518
    Ratings:
    +1,988
    ...and if he overpaid a FA you'd be pig piling on top of TT again. We get it, you don't like him but don't distort the truth. Yes those things have happened but TT doesn't set out to overpay re-signed players. You insinuate that it's his strategic plan. You are flat out wrong.

    Back to Spikes. I wouldn't be surprised if he is brought into the mix. Thompson knows that he has depth issues there and he's never been afraid of competition. Many players that he's brought in or drafted have said that they were surprised, because the Packers showed no interest before signing them.
     
  20. Joe Nor Cal Packer

    Joe Nor Cal Packer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2014
    Messages:
    535
    Ratings:
    +122
    Certainly not in the case of Cobb or Bulaga. And he let Williams and House walk rather than overpay. But he did overpay for Brad Jones and maybe Shields and Burnett. But a general statement that he overlays his guys is not accurate.
     
  21. Joe Nor Cal Packer

    Joe Nor Cal Packer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2014
    Messages:
    535
    Ratings:
    +122
    Overlays???? Freudian slip. Overpays was what I meant. Need a coffee!
     
  22. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,753
    Ratings:
    +3,691
    I agree that the names at ILB represent a lot of question marks. I would have preferred Kendricks or Anthony at #30.

    However, Ryan/Barrington has a lot of similarities to Hawk/Bishop. I believe that's the profile they're going for, even if the lack of experience might prove less productive than the 2010 combination. Then there's Matthews' return engagement at ILB.
     
  23. Mondio

    Mondio Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,795
    Ratings:
    +1,756
    Hawk was fine. A very good and dependable player. He didn't break any banks and when he was too expensive, he was cut and re-signed. I thought Burnett was playing himself into a nice contract. Then we paired him with the worst complimentary safeties in the leage and he looked horrid. I thought they made a mistake. Last year he was greatly improved again and for the money, I think he earned it. I expect him to grow again this year actually.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. Mondio

    Mondio Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,795
    Ratings:
    +1,756
    Yes, the Jones signing didn't really work out. It seemed to make sense at the time, but really fizzled shortly after. I chalk that up to not being able to win them all, ,and it's not as if it was a blockbuster deal. Too much yes, but not all that damaging
     
  25. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,589
    Ratings:
    +6,582
    I'm sorry, but the contract the Packers signed Brad Jones to never made any sense to anybody at any point.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Disagree Disagree x 1

Share This Page