Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Teams working back towards the 4-3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreenBaySlacker" data-source="post: 715094" data-attributes="member: 9780"><p>Wimm is just soar. This debate has been going on a number of years. Might as well take it another...</p><p></p><p>You wimm. You said a million times that olb, is Basicly a de most the time... but apparently only when it suits your argument...because before that you argued a million times about Aldon Smith being a olb. I thought he was a de at the time. BOY WAS I WRONG!!! I say peppers is a olb and we need a de in front of him?!?!?! And I'm the idiot.....</p><p></p><p>Let's go way back. Remember my 5-2 4 from the old days. Took years of <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/poop.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":poop:" title="Poop :poop:" data-shortname=":poop:" /> for it. Quick recap for those who can't remember. It starts with a dominant nose tackle who forces the double team, and still makes plays. Two dtackles. And two small DEs who can run with a te or rb in short passes if they have to... kgb, and our stable of 4-3 dlinemen including BIG Grady Jackson at nose. I was a big fan of Grady. That's how long this debate goes back for me...</p><p></p><p>Second part of the strategy is to have CBs who can shut down the opposing #1 wr. And cover man. . Because a stud receiving target is the great equalizer. Meaning you can double him and he still wins sometime... our roster was perfect for it. </p><p>I felt dumb when I realized my 5-2 was a 3-4..... I just didn't know what a 3-4 was back then .lol</p><p></p><p>We hadn't fielded a great dline since Cullen Jenkins left... if it was my defense. A real 3-4 with a dominant nose and shut down CBs like woodson and Harris. If we had something similar to that the last 7-8 years, and consistently was the reason we failed in the playoffs against great offenses...? I would definitely shut up about it. But instead I get a tired Daniel's/Guion. Peppers and 3 lbs. And a extra tweener to help bend but not break...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Tough teams make our dynamic speed defense look like crap when it counts. </p><p></p><p>It's time to put a defensive line back on the field. Not a olb who is only a de when it suits you. That to me is a olb still. Because in my 5-2-4, there's still 3 dlinemen taking blockers so the DEs (or were actually olbs)can get around the corner....</p><p></p><p>Can't stop 5 good dlinemen with 5 good olinemen every play...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreenBaySlacker, post: 715094, member: 9780"] Wimm is just soar. This debate has been going on a number of years. Might as well take it another... You wimm. You said a million times that olb, is Basicly a de most the time... but apparently only when it suits your argument...because before that you argued a million times about Aldon Smith being a olb. I thought he was a de at the time. BOY WAS I WRONG!!! I say peppers is a olb and we need a de in front of him?!?!?! And I'm the idiot..... Let's go way back. Remember my 5-2 4 from the old days. Took years of :poop: for it. Quick recap for those who can't remember. It starts with a dominant nose tackle who forces the double team, and still makes plays. Two dtackles. And two small DEs who can run with a te or rb in short passes if they have to... kgb, and our stable of 4-3 dlinemen including BIG Grady Jackson at nose. I was a big fan of Grady. That's how long this debate goes back for me... Second part of the strategy is to have CBs who can shut down the opposing #1 wr. And cover man. . Because a stud receiving target is the great equalizer. Meaning you can double him and he still wins sometime... our roster was perfect for it. I felt dumb when I realized my 5-2 was a 3-4..... I just didn't know what a 3-4 was back then .lol We hadn't fielded a great dline since Cullen Jenkins left... if it was my defense. A real 3-4 with a dominant nose and shut down CBs like woodson and Harris. If we had something similar to that the last 7-8 years, and consistently was the reason we failed in the playoffs against great offenses...? I would definitely shut up about it. But instead I get a tired Daniel's/Guion. Peppers and 3 lbs. And a extra tweener to help bend but not break... Tough teams make our dynamic speed defense look like crap when it counts. It's time to put a defensive line back on the field. Not a olb who is only a de when it suits you. That to me is a olb still. Because in my 5-2-4, there's still 3 dlinemen taking blockers so the DEs (or were actually olbs)can get around the corner.... Can't stop 5 good dlinemen with 5 good olinemen every play... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
mradtke66
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: mradtke66
8 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
33 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
35 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 3:39 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Teams working back towards the 4-3
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top