Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Taysom Hill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 884857" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>no kidding, I still have no idea what they were thinking giving him that money, even if for just a year or 2. In certain situations he's a fine player, gives you options kind of. But I think defenses are figuring it out by now with him. Collinsworth pointed out a perfect example of his limits in our game against him. </p><p></p><p>He either splits out and runs simple routes and sometimes he's left wide open, success. Or he motions back in and blocks or he gets a direct snap with a read and run. BUt there was one, the pass was open, he had to throw it early, and he never saw it and was looking to run. Thankfully for us, and it went nowhere. </p><p></p><p>A QB that can only make 1 read isn't hard to defend. Not once you figure out their 1 read or an injury or 2 slows them down. </p><p></p><p>I don't think Hill increases their redzone efficiency. Sure, there may be some stat that shows he has a better percentage, but I bet if you put him in there in ALL the situations instead of just the perfect situations that percentage would be lower than if you just kept the ball in a QB like Bree's hands. </p><p></p><p>I sure as heck wouldn't want them taking the ball out of Rodgers' hands ever thinking Hill gave us a better option. Because he doesn't. Now that doesn't mean I'm totally against giving hard working players a chance for some glory now and again, but you don't pay gadget players 16 million dollars to do it. 2 at the most. He's not that integral to the team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 884857, member: 10441"] no kidding, I still have no idea what they were thinking giving him that money, even if for just a year or 2. In certain situations he's a fine player, gives you options kind of. But I think defenses are figuring it out by now with him. Collinsworth pointed out a perfect example of his limits in our game against him. He either splits out and runs simple routes and sometimes he's left wide open, success. Or he motions back in and blocks or he gets a direct snap with a read and run. BUt there was one, the pass was open, he had to throw it early, and he never saw it and was looking to run. Thankfully for us, and it went nowhere. A QB that can only make 1 read isn't hard to defend. Not once you figure out their 1 read or an injury or 2 slows them down. I don't think Hill increases their redzone efficiency. Sure, there may be some stat that shows he has a better percentage, but I bet if you put him in there in ALL the situations instead of just the perfect situations that percentage would be lower than if you just kept the ball in a QB like Bree's hands. I sure as heck wouldn't want them taking the ball out of Rodgers' hands ever thinking Hill gave us a better option. Because he doesn't. Now that doesn't mean I'm totally against giving hard working players a chance for some glory now and again, but you don't pay gadget players 16 million dollars to do it. 2 at the most. He's not that integral to the team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
Heyjoe4
GreenBaySlacker
gopkrs
Latest posts
H
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Heyjoe4
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
8 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 1:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Taysom Hill
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster