Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Taysom Hill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GleefulGary" data-source="post: 865388" data-attributes="member: 12583"><p>To start...what? Anyone can be named a starting QB? I honestly don't even get what you're saying. </p><p></p><p>To continue, I never said anything about a franchise QB in my post. Not sure why you're bringing that up either. </p><p></p><p>If you would like to post your opinion, that would be great. I'd like to avoid confusion. As far as I can tell, it sounds like you think he's a player capable of being a starting QB, but even if he isn't, is worth a 2nd round pick. Please correct me if I'm wrong. </p><p></p><p>Finally, his injury history is important because he's shown that when he's a full time player, he has not been able to stay healthy. One more time, he has shown, multiple times, that when he's a full time player, he cannot stay healthy. A talented player that can't stay healthy loses some value. Nick Perry being a familiar example. Now offense and ST's combined, Hill played 528 snaps. The Saints ran over 1000 snaps on offense. Pretty clear he's not a full time player.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GleefulGary, post: 865388, member: 12583"] To start...what? Anyone can be named a starting QB? I honestly don't even get what you're saying. To continue, I never said anything about a franchise QB in my post. Not sure why you're bringing that up either. If you would like to post your opinion, that would be great. I'd like to avoid confusion. As far as I can tell, it sounds like you think he's a player capable of being a starting QB, but even if he isn't, is worth a 2nd round pick. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Finally, his injury history is important because he's shown that when he's a full time player, he has not been able to stay healthy. One more time, he has shown, multiple times, that when he's a full time player, he cannot stay healthy. A talented player that can't stay healthy loses some value. Nick Perry being a familiar example. Now offense and ST's combined, Hill played 528 snaps. The Saints ran over 1000 snaps on offense. Pretty clear he's not a full time player. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Magooch
rmontro
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:37 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 6:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Taysom Hill
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top