Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sky King" data-source="post: 858918" data-attributes="member: 7171">I never suggested that he supplant Rodgers or any other starters, so please end any association with that narrative and me.  Again, look to the bottom of the roster for comparisons, not the top.  Hill can play several positions as a backup.  He could be the last receiver, last running back, last ST player, and last QB.  Who knows, maybe he could even play DB in an emergency injury situation. Most importantly, he can be the last backup at all of those positions simultaneously.  There's value in that kind of versatility, especially on game day. Versatility is hardly a new concept in GB. Audit the final rosters in GB the year he was cut and ever since.  There are several players at the bottom of any of those final rosters that he could have replaced. The front office and coaching staff underestimated the attraction of Hill's ability and his versatility to other teams despite his impressive flashes during the preseason. They took a chance he would go unclaimed and they lost that bet.  He's not a starter for the Saints either, but he sure has value.</blockquote>

Total: 1,155 (members: 3, guests: 1,152)