Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NYPacker" data-source="post: 278489" data-attributes="member: 1831"><p>I see what you are trying to say. Mays was considered to be an elite player until his senior year however Brown transformed from a nobody into a first round candidate. So what you're saying is that based on improvement Brown clearly has the better upside. Which still doesn't answer my question, how come if Caroll passes on Mays twice it's considered a bad thing but if Caroll passes on Brown twice it shouldn't really be anything to worry about? In fact if Brown is as good as you mentioned Caroll should take him with his first pick. Hell the Redskins who are moving to a ZBS should take him with the higher pick. I understand that Brown is made to look like the more consistent player but if you're talking about Mays and Browns' college careers overall it seems that Mays is the more consistent one. Mays earned his spot ever since freshman year while Brown had to work his way up. Mays as well has never had a concern with injuries whilst Brown has suffered numerous ankle and calf injuries. Mays had one bad season of out 4 years of playing and Brown has never got a starting spot till '08. I'm not a Taylor Mays fan at all but this logic that you're imposing on Mays is clearly unfair when you're not giving the same amount of doubt to any of Carrol's other former players.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 501 (members: 0, guests: 501)