Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Sunday's Loss Proves Green Bay Packers Playoff Success Hinges on Earning Home Field Advantage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackerfaninCarolina" data-source="post: 737794" data-attributes="member: 9364"><p>I would say there is a sense though that this team really needs to capture that 1st or 2nd seed because the teams that have been getting the top seeds lately ... well more or less seem to be on par with their record. I mean ...</p><p></p><p>Maybe last year's Cowboys team wasn't nearly as good as their 13-3 record would've indicated, but aside from that it's been pretty telling.</p><p></p><p>I'm not going to revise history here, but I felt like the 2010 Packers were at least a 13-3 team in a 10-6 record. That Bears team that finished 11-5 and got that bye week would have never even made the playoffs in other years, and the Falcons of that year were more like a 10-6 team that ended up 13-3. I'd say Green Bay winning on the road all the way to the Superbowl was kind of a correction of misplaced teams' records, just as the 2006 Colts team was actually a better team than the 2005 Colts but just didn't have the record reflecting it.</p><p></p><p>It may be a bit too early to assume Atlanta will be the team vying for the no. 1 or no. 2 seed considering there's a lot at play down in their division and corrections end up happening all across the board as a season wears on. BUT ... if we did get them in the playoffs, I would prefer playing them at home up here in Lambeau because as was already stated in their near loss against Chicago, they seem much less effective on real grass, and I can't picture Matt Ryan being able to stay on the mark too well up in the freezing temperatures, or Julio being able to keep his footing on the snowy turf. Same thing with Cam Newton. Those players are the worst in cold weather I've ever seen.</p><p></p><p>We lost to Atlanta in 2002 because our defense was so banged up it was limping, and Brett Favre just did what ole Big Game Brett always did. And the 2007 and 2011 Giants games ... well the Giants play in cold weather too so it doesn't affect them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackerfaninCarolina, post: 737794, member: 9364"] I would say there is a sense though that this team really needs to capture that 1st or 2nd seed because the teams that have been getting the top seeds lately ... well more or less seem to be on par with their record. I mean ... Maybe last year's Cowboys team wasn't nearly as good as their 13-3 record would've indicated, but aside from that it's been pretty telling. I'm not going to revise history here, but I felt like the 2010 Packers were at least a 13-3 team in a 10-6 record. That Bears team that finished 11-5 and got that bye week would have never even made the playoffs in other years, and the Falcons of that year were more like a 10-6 team that ended up 13-3. I'd say Green Bay winning on the road all the way to the Superbowl was kind of a correction of misplaced teams' records, just as the 2006 Colts team was actually a better team than the 2005 Colts but just didn't have the record reflecting it. It may be a bit too early to assume Atlanta will be the team vying for the no. 1 or no. 2 seed considering there's a lot at play down in their division and corrections end up happening all across the board as a season wears on. BUT ... if we did get them in the playoffs, I would prefer playing them at home up here in Lambeau because as was already stated in their near loss against Chicago, they seem much less effective on real grass, and I can't picture Matt Ryan being able to stay on the mark too well up in the freezing temperatures, or Julio being able to keep his footing on the snowy turf. Same thing with Cam Newton. Those players are the worst in cold weather I've ever seen. We lost to Atlanta in 2002 because our defense was so banged up it was limping, and Brett Favre just did what ole Big Game Brett always did. And the 2007 and 2011 Giants games ... well the Giants play in cold weather too so it doesn't affect them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 11:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Starting 5 - CB
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 11:09 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Draft Review (2025)
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 10:28 PM
Draft Talk
Mediocre punters from da past and other things....
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 10:26 PM
NFL Discussions
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 10:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Sunday's Loss Proves Green Bay Packers Playoff Success Hinges on Earning Home Field Advantage
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top