Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Suh gonna pay for that
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 590420" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>I know what the difference is. I realize that people would tend to give Matthews the benefit of the doubt that Suh does not have and I agree. Benefit of the doubt is something that needs to be earned (or lost) The thing is most objective people would wait for future instances to occur before passing judgement. Anytime Suh does something like this a certain group of people will automatically say it was intentional. That has nothing to do with the benefit of the doubt that has to do with one time guilty (or in this case several time guilty) every time guilty. If Matthews were to do it a certain group of people will automatically think its an accident. That is not the benefit of the doubt they have already judged him innocent of any future miss steps. Some of those people have already stated as much.</p><p></p><p>I don't have a problem with people who watched this happen and say he did it on purpose. People see things differently. What I have a problem with is the people who watched this and say "well it's Suh and he has done this sort of thing before so obviously he did it on purpose" Taking past actions into account is one thing but basing your judgement on them is something else all together.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 590420, member: 10247"] I know what the difference is. I realize that people would tend to give Matthews the benefit of the doubt that Suh does not have and I agree. Benefit of the doubt is something that needs to be earned (or lost) The thing is most objective people would wait for future instances to occur before passing judgement. Anytime Suh does something like this a certain group of people will automatically say it was intentional. That has nothing to do with the benefit of the doubt that has to do with one time guilty (or in this case several time guilty) every time guilty. If Matthews were to do it a certain group of people will automatically think its an accident. That is not the benefit of the doubt they have already judged him innocent of any future miss steps. Some of those people have already stated as much. I don't have a problem with people who watched this happen and say he did it on purpose. People see things differently. What I have a problem with is the people who watched this and say "well it's Suh and he has done this sort of thing before so obviously he did it on purpose" Taking past actions into account is one thing but basing your judgement on them is something else all together. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
lancer84
DoURant
Schultz
txj
Green_Bay_Packers
Firethorn1001
Packermudgeon
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: DoURant
6 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: GreenNGold_81
25 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: PikeBadger
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: longtimefan
59 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: Dantés
Today at 9:35 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Suh gonna pay for that
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top