Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1054245" data-attributes="member: 10086">Oh kinda like Eagles 28 Jaguars 23? or were you thinking more Vikings 12 Jaguars 7? Or maybe Bears 24 Rams 18? Or how about Vikings 30 Bears 27 in OT? Or Washington 18 Bears 15? Or Detroit 23 Bears 20? Almost Every Great team struggles against low echelon teams. Carolina took KC under the 2-minute Tie score. The following week KC beat the Raiders. The Raiders were winning until 9 minutes left in 4th qtr.  KC beat a 4 Win Team with a 4th qtr FG. Your logic directly implies teams who win close games against low echelon are just bad.So you are literally using an argument that implies Detroit, GB, KC, Vikings, Rams and Washington are bad. Then The Ravens must be terrible they lost to Las Vegas this year.Those don’t sound like powerhouses to me. They sound more like 2024 Houston, LA and Seattle level teams.Hmmm. That sounds eerily familiar to 2024. GB losses are to these opponents across 16 contests14 Wins13 Wins14 Wins14 Wins14 Wins.Sure we did. Then why is it anymore impossible next weekend? I would argue that a young team would be better (in general) at the end of the season than the beginning. Meaning trending upwards. So if a team with a 3rd year QB (2010) and veterans everywhere can improve going into postseason, then even more argument that a young team finding their footing can also</blockquote>

Total: 226 (members: 1, guests: 225)