Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n Duds vs The Bears
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1055227" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>Yeah, I can't be that bothered by it. </p><p></p><p>You're still going to have a hard time convincing me that going to LA or Washington wouldn't have been preferable to going to Philly. </p><p></p><p>More than that though, finishing as the #7 seed guarantees that if we do manage beat Philly, we're now locked into traveling to Detroit in the next round. Hypothetically, if we got the #6 seed and the Commanders got the #7 seed* and they managed to beat Philly (as they just did recently), then Washington would travel to Detroit and we would instead play Minnesota/LA/Tampa/etc (however it shakes out). In other words: finishing as the #7 seed guarantees we will need to face the top two seeds. Finishing as the #6 seed allows for the (slim) possibility of avoiding both top seeds. </p><p></p><p>And I know people will (mistakenly) claim that "you have to beat the best to be the best" or other cliches, but it's awfully tough for me to make a case that getting locked in to facing the top 2 seeds doesn't put you at a distinct disadvantage compared to possibly avoiding them. </p><p></p><p>*Now obviously with a Washington win this possibility was removed. But this wasn't determined at the time of our matchup and we couldn't have accounted for it in our game preparation one way or another.</p><p></p><p>With regards to injuries, it sure looks like Love just had a funny bone or something and should be totally fine - he was warming up seemingly preparing to go back in when it looked for a minute there like Willis was hurt. ( And if we really believed this was a meaningless game and thought Love wasn't 100% good to go and were STILL having him possibly warm up to get back in the game, then our management is utterly incompetent and should be shown the door ). </p><p></p><p>And Watson, let's be real...God bless the guy but he was probably just as likely to get injured by a strong breeze on the tarmac upon arriving in Philly as he was getting hurt by suiting up today. I don't know if there's any degree of "load management" that can prevent him from picking up random knocks at this point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1055227, member: 17987"] Yeah, I can't be that bothered by it. You're still going to have a hard time convincing me that going to LA or Washington wouldn't have been preferable to going to Philly. More than that though, finishing as the #7 seed guarantees that if we do manage beat Philly, we're now locked into traveling to Detroit in the next round. Hypothetically, if we got the #6 seed and the Commanders got the #7 seed* and they managed to beat Philly (as they just did recently), then Washington would travel to Detroit and we would instead play Minnesota/LA/Tampa/etc (however it shakes out). In other words: finishing as the #7 seed guarantees we will need to face the top two seeds. Finishing as the #6 seed allows for the (slim) possibility of avoiding both top seeds. And I know people will (mistakenly) claim that "you have to beat the best to be the best" or other cliches, but it's awfully tough for me to make a case that getting locked in to facing the top 2 seeds doesn't put you at a distinct disadvantage compared to possibly avoiding them. *Now obviously with a Washington win this possibility was removed. But this wasn't determined at the time of our matchup and we couldn't have accounted for it in our game preparation one way or another. With regards to injuries, it sure looks like Love just had a funny bone or something and should be totally fine - he was warming up seemingly preparing to go back in when it looked for a minute there like Willis was hurt. ( And if we really believed this was a meaningless game and thought Love wasn't 100% good to go and were STILL having him possibly warm up to get back in the game, then our management is utterly incompetent and should be shown the door ). And Watson, let's be real...God bless the guy but he was probably just as likely to get injured by a strong breeze on the tarmac upon arriving in Philly as he was getting hurt by suiting up today. I don't know if there's any degree of "load management" that can prevent him from picking up random knocks at this point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n Duds vs The Bears
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
