Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1073054" data-attributes="member: 10086">Yes. What was strange was it was also eerily similar to being backed up at Cleveland. Trying to do too much when the flow was a Defensive game.  Run the ball and they use TO #3. Then make Cleveland go 60-70 yards for a TD or die in the process.  They had not scored a TD across 57 min.Here you have a chance to go in Halftime up 13-9 and regroup. Had we been sniffing midfield then I’d try to get 15 yards. I’d think differently there. We’re at the GB27 and just used timeout #3 with :21 seconds. Unless you throw it for 35-40 yards for an 50-55 yard try or get out of bounds immediately or spike the ball with :02 sec. Only way that attempt made sense is if we had 4 Timeouts or threw a Hail Mary. Another poor example of Clock Management vs Risk.  Hire A Consultant if you can’t manage Down n distance real time after a Timeout.</blockquote>

Total: 1,128 (members: 2, guests: 1,126)