Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1073017" data-attributes="member: 17987">Can't watch video (at work) so I don't know if it was mentioned in it or not but I was curious about this as well.Initially it was called that there was a receiver in the vicinity. This was of course painfully obvious to be false, there's no one even close.Then I believe it was explained away as saying "if he wasn't in control of the ball then there doesn't need to be a receiver nearby" which, maybe I am just not as familiar with the rules verbiage but that's the first time in my life I've heard that explanation. (But in any case, if Prescott was not in control of the ball, would there not be a case then that it's a live ball and a fumble? the forward motion of the hand is almost always interpreted to mean "in control" at least to the degree that it's ruled a forward pass...)</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 925 (members: 0, guests: 925)