Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 890111" data-attributes="member: 7261">What you are failing to acknowledge is that on this particular play Rodgers had only enough time for ONE option, the receiver that was his primary target, Davante Adams.  Rodgers DID NOT have time to look at any of the other 3 receivers. MVS and Lazard would have been terrible options.  Both probably tackled short, game over.There is a big difference between a play call, with various receivers being the primary and secondary targets and what actually happens during the play.  This is a classic example of people using hindsight and saying "Tonyan should have been his primary target." and carrying that into "Rodgers should have seen Adams was covered and threw the ball to Tonyan, this is proof Rodgers only looks for Adams". Which is what you and some others were saying after the game. One poster even saying he should have taken the sack.  No timeouts, 7 seconds on clock, a sack?How do you fix this problem that some have with Adams getting a lot of passes and first reads?  Ask yourself, why wasn't Tonyan, MVS or Lazard his primary target on this critical last play of the game?  Bottom line, until Gute gets Rodgers better and more reliable receiving weapons, Adams is most likely going to be his go to guy.  If Rodgers is afforded more time, which he wasn't on this play, he will find other targets like Tonyan.</blockquote>

Total: 1,148 (members: 3, guests: 1,145)