Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs and duds KC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Poppa San" data-source="post: 1016360" data-attributes="member: 2547"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.si.com/nfl/packers/news/after-packers-chiefs-debacle-whats-officiating-solution[/URL]</p><p>[Where the officials did get it right was in the timing following the Rashee Rice fumble, Isiah Pacheco ejection and officiating review sandwiched between the other two controversial plays. </p><p>Allen reset the clock to 50 seconds – the time of the tackle on Rice – but there was not a 10-second runoff.</p><p>“It’s interesting. It’s a good question and it came up,” Blandino said. “Normally, had there not been a foul during the play, there would be a runoff. But because there was a flag during the play, the clock would have stopped, anyway.”</p><p>The clock wasn’t put into motion pre-snap, either, so the Chiefs got to treat a tackle-inbounds play as if the tackle were out of bounds. Again, that was officiated correctly.</p><p>“By rule in the last 5 minutes of the fourth quarter after a penalty, the clock starts on the snap. It’s just an unusual situation,” Blandino said.]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Poppa San, post: 1016360, member: 2547"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.si.com/nfl/packers/news/after-packers-chiefs-debacle-whats-officiating-solution[/URL] [Where the officials did get it right was in the timing following the Rashee Rice fumble, Isiah Pacheco ejection and officiating review sandwiched between the other two controversial plays. Allen reset the clock to 50 seconds – the time of the tackle on Rice – but there was not a 10-second runoff. “It’s interesting. It’s a good question and it came up,” Blandino said. “Normally, had there not been a foul during the play, there would be a runoff. But because there was a flag during the play, the clock would have stopped, anyway.” The clock wasn’t put into motion pre-snap, either, so the Chiefs got to treat a tackle-inbounds play as if the tackle were out of bounds. Again, that was officiated correctly. “By rule in the last 5 minutes of the fourth quarter after a penalty, the clock starts on the snap. It’s just an unusual situation,” Blandino said.] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
scheeler
Latest posts
Final Thoughts on 2025 Draft
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 3:40 PM
Draft Talk
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 3:35 PM
Draft Talk
Pick 198 Warren Brinson DT Georgia
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 3:34 PM
Draft Talk
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:02 PM
College Sports
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs and duds KC
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top