Studs and duds Charger game

red4tribe

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
1,342
Reaction score
345
Location
New York
This is a tough one. I don't feel like anyone played particularly well, or particularly bad. But, if I had to pick...

Studs- Randall, Starks, goal line D (stopped them two out of three times), run D, Datone Jones

Duds- Cobb, Lacy, inconsistent O
 
Last edited:

thisisnate

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
1,627
Reaction score
185
Location
Maine
Duds...
-I'm not even sure who to point out for duds. There was an awful lot not to like about this game.

Studs...
-I guess Janis made a few plays, got a call or two, and was solid without mistakes on special teams. Not a huge contribution, but a much needed one with our WRs dropping like flies.
-Datone looked powerful
 

G0P4ckG0

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Messages
761
Reaction score
153
Studs - Starks, Randall, D. Jones, Special teams coverage
Duds - Everyone else
 

bigbubbatd

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
1,679
Reaction score
166
Dud - Defensive scheme for not changing to stop the shallow crossing route. It was there for San Diego all day.

Studs - Hard to find one after the first quarter. I am probably acting entitled bc it was a win but that was one of the more disappointing performances in a win I can remember.

I will rescind that a little. Datone Jones was a stud today. He looked like out best dlineman today
 

JK64

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
1,088
Reaction score
272
Studs: Starks, Special Teams

Duds: Micah Hyde, Shields, Dix, O-line.
 

Sky King

158.3
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
2,817
Reaction score
329
Location
Out of the clear blue western skies...
Studs: Rivers and especially his makeshift OL for being terrific on a short week

Duds: The Packers front seven for getting dominated by a bunch of no-name third-stringers masquerading as a Chargers OL. Heart and determination trumped last week's press clippings about the Packers D. Chargers must not have read them
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
14,262
Reaction score
5,661
Studs. Again. Datone, Starks, Rollins, a Peppers,
Duds: Chargers for putting up a record of worst proportions. 500+ yards passing for the least amount of points in history! Lol
 

dbain21

Chicagoland Packer Fan
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
535
Reaction score
67
Very ugly performance but i'm not about to sit here and act like we're a 2-4 team or anything. 6-0 and we got room to improve.

Studs:
Starks - The number 1 back in this offense? I still think lacy is banged up and the number 1, but Starks is impressing me more this year.
JJ - can get what feels like 5 yards but still contribute cause he catches TD's
Rodgers - Sometimes he's too conservative, but he improved upon last weeks un-charactistic performance. Not worried about The boss
Janis
Dantone

Duds:
Micah Hyde
Damarious Randall (nice play at the end though)
Shields
Rest of the secondary basically
Lacy
 

Half Empty

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
599
So we lost then?

I don't believe so, but they definitely showed that they can lose. Those of us who don't care for the "a-win-is-a-win" philosophy (except for the Super Bowl) remember years like 2010 and 2014. This was supposed to be a blowout win over a completely crippled Charger OLine, not a last preservation of an ugly win.
 

Reggie White Cheese

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 26, 2015
Messages
170
Reaction score
15
This is a tough one. I don't feel like anyone played particularly well, or particularly bad. But, if I had to pick...

Studs- Randall, Starks, goal line D (stopped them two out of three times), run D, Datone Jones

Duds- Cobb, Lacy, inconsistent O

Did you watch the same game I did, Randall, Hyde, pretty much anyone but Ha-Ha- got burned every play on defense... What an embarrassment this defense was today.

STARKS was the only Stud, not even Rodgers got the nod today... I am grateful for the bye, and the win.. but whew what a close one.
 

Carl

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 6, 2013
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
272
Location
Madison, Wisconsin
I don't believe so, but they definitely showed that they can lose. Those of us who don't care for the "a-win-is-a-win" philosophy (except for the Super Bowl) remember years like 2010 and 2014. This was supposed to be a blowout win over a completely crippled Charger OLine, not a last preservation of an ugly win.

Just pointing out that I don't think it's possible to win a game if the entire team was a dud.
 

Ogsponge

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
1,501
Reaction score
291
Location
Wisconsin
Studs: The entire Packer team and coaching staff for actually winning a hard fought game and getting it done in crunch time, something they have not done hardly at all in 4 years.

Duds: all the posters on this board that expect every game to be total and utter domination. You all should be more excited by the Packers winning 2 games in a row when they were not playing all that well than the thinking every game should be a blowout. Not every games is going to be perfect but championship teams find ways to win the ugly ones, the Packers for the first time in 4 years are doing that.
 

dbain21

Chicagoland Packer Fan
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
535
Reaction score
67
I don't believe so, but they definitely showed that they can lose. Those of us who don't care for the "a-win-is-a-win" philosophy (except for the Super Bowl) remember years like 2010 and 2014. This was supposed to be a blowout win over a completely crippled Charger OLine, not a last preservation of an ugly win.

I know fans and even analyst might say or allude to things like this, but I don't think that any NFL game should be realistically expected to be a blowout.
 

P-E-Z

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2011
Messages
602
Reaction score
51
Stud Starks......
Duds the pass rushers..... We lucky to won that game. We cant play like in the next 2 games....
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top