Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 940106" data-attributes="member: 13032">It's tough when another team plays well enough to win (and I think the Browns came really  on Sunday) and then they lose.  For me, winning and losing is absolute.  The winning team is the untested winner, the losing team the opposite.It's fun to consider "what ifs" - like what if Douglas doesn't make that pick?  But that's probably the main reason the Packers won, command of turnovers.  And sacks.  It could just as easily be argued that by Q3, Cleveland should have known that Chubb was hot, Mayfield was not.  Leave the ball in Chubb's hands.  If they make this one change, the Packers get one, maybe two less pics and the Browns win.That's not what happened.  Bill Bellichek, arguably a great choice, would have exploited GB's horrible run defense and pounded the ball on the ground.  Stefanski didn't;t make that simple, in-game adjustment.So the Packers deserved to win, the Browns did not.  And in a year, no one will remember anyway.</blockquote>

Total: 647 (members: 4, guests: 643)