Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 787183">While Flynn didn't have success with other teams he was a great fit for the Packers scheme and was definitely one of the reasons the offense didn't miss a huge beat without Rodgers.It's definitely foolish to give up on Kizer after he threw a total of seven passes vs. the Bears. While there's no doubt he has potential he didn't look improved over last season on Sunday by any means.Kizer is definitely a more talented quarterback than Callahan. In addition he's only counting $690K towards the Packers cap, which is only $200K above the rookie minimum. On the other hand the Browns use $16 million of their cap space on Taylor this season.It seems Randall was considered to be a locker room cancer, therefore getting something in return instead of releasing him was a smart move by Gutekunst.I agree that it might be smart to have a veteran backup who has already had success in the league going forward.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,223 (members: 0, guests: 1,223)