Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 465948" data-attributes="member: 4300">"Degrade" him? No, I just disagreed with him. I posted “Good posting hawknballs with one exception”. Neither you nor hawknballs answered my one objection to his post: If there wasn’t indisputable video proof of the INT why the nearly unanimous outrage over the call? If there was any ambiguity in the video the outrage wouldn’t have been so widespread and those backing the NFL in its dispute with the NFLRA would be loudly pointing to the ambiguity. This point is as obvious as the INT IMO.  The only reason for that call being upheld upon review is if simultaneous possession wasn’t subject to review. But it is – only in the end zone. I think there’s a good chance the reviewer didn’t know the rules.  BTW -2 on your post: Your complaint lacks substance. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" /> </blockquote>

Total: 1,311 (members: 4, guests: 1,307)