I still say fire his worthless ***, and hopefully TT also.
care to explain why you think this?
I still say fire his worthless ***, and hopefully TT also.
I still say fire his worthless ***, and hopefully TT also.
MM was a joke when he got hired, coordinator for the #32 ranked offense (San Francisco)! What was TT thinking?!? He single handedly lost the Detroit game with his horrible play calling, all of a sudden trying to develop a running game in week #14, when they could've made a move for a Lynch (Buffalo) or Choice (Dallas). I have seen a lot of teams lose games with "Prevent Defense"; MM is the 1st I've seen lose several with "Prevent Offense". MM and TT: GOT TO GO!!!
MM was a joke when he got hired, coordinator for the #32 ranked offense (San Francisco)! What was TT thinking?!? He single handedly lost the Detroit game with his horrible play calling, all of a sudden trying to develop a running game in week #14, when they could've made a move for a Lynch (Buffalo) or Choice (Dallas). I have seen a lot of teams lose games with "Prevent Defense"; MM is the 1st I've seen lose several with "Prevent Offense". MM and TT: GOT TO GO!!!
MM was a joke when he got hired, coordinator for the #32 ranked offense (San Francisco)! What was TT thinking?!? He single handedly lost the Detroit game with his horrible play calling, all of a sudden trying to develop a running game in week #14, when they could've made a move for a Lynch (Buffalo) or Choice (Dallas). I have seen a lot of teams lose games with "Prevent Defense"; MM is the 1st I've seen lose several with "Prevent Offense". MM and TT: GOT TO GO!!!
Not sure who said it earlier, but I agree. I think MM is a above average head coach in a league that is probably replacing 1/3 of the coaches this year. I do however think he should give up the play calling. The 1st three possessions against Detroit were terrible. The 1st and goal series against New England equally bad.
In the New England game it was play calling, when you run the same play on 1st & 2nd without gaining an inch & go right back to it on 3rd! To me that is play calling. That was a huge momentum shift in that game which we dominated and should have won, minus the 3 or 4 interceptions the we dropped. And against Detroit, I don't have a beef with trying to establish a running game, but to start a game with 8 runs in the 1st 9 plays, all 3 & out! The pass works, at least use it to open the run... just my opinion.
all your post you have made have been negative and against TT and MM. Are you just trolling? Cant you talk about anything other than TT and MM?
Nope not trolling, and am I not entitled to my opinion? IMO MM is just not that great of a coach, as far as TT. My dislike for him has nothing to do with the Favre situation. I just dislike his lack of doing anything to make the team win NOW. His lack of pulling the trigger on a RB is just the latest of his screw ups in free agency. A team NEEDS a solid running game to progress in the playoffs. I would love to be proved wrong this year though.
Win NOW, like the Vikings?Nope not trolling, and am I not entitled to my opinion? IMO MM is just not that great of a coach, as far as TT. My dislike for him has nothing to do with the Favre situation. I just dislike his lack of doing anything to make the team win NOW. His lack of pulling the trigger on a RB is just the latest of his screw ups in free agency. A team NEEDS a solid running game to progress in the playoffs. I would love to be proved wrong this year though.
Exactly. The future is looking very rosy for the Vikings and the other WIN NOW franchise the Redskins. Why can't we get a GM who wants to WIN NOW?Win NOW, like the Vikings?
You are entitled to your opinion, and I agree that we lack a running game, but please don't act like our RB's are complete dirt. Our OL couldn't open up pockets for the life of them. There are very few AD's, MJD's and CJ's and a "pretty good" RB wouldn't have a great deal more success than our current RBs.
On top of that, this team has never been a NOW team. We have never been the desperate, scramble for free agents, type of team like MN and NYJ. And this will make us a threat for a hell of alot of years.
Exactly. The future is looking very rosy for the Vikings and the other WIN NOW franchise the Redskins. Why can't we get a GM who wants to WIN NOW?
People think that winning in the NFL is just a decision. That one GM each year thinks, 'I think we should try and win the Superbowl this year', so he does. That TT plans to not win the Superbowl for God knows what reason. There are 31 other teams that want to win also. Signing FAs, in most cases, makes your team worse,not better. In reality, TT signed Woodson, Pickett and Chillar; and are the only moderate to high dollar FAs. All three have been a success. TT is probably the only GM batting 1000 in the mid to high FA market. One could argue that he is, therefore, the most successful GM in FA.
Well said.
ANYONE who says we need to give up draft picks for in-season trades is just an idiot. I'm sorry, but we've been over this nonsense over and over again. There's many a RB thread on this forum, and it keeps getting proven to the naysayers that we made the RIGHT decision in not trading for Marshawn Lynch based on our team's actual needs.
Besides, he's done **** for Seattle. Jackson has had a MUCH better season.