Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
So I know I'll be flamed for this, but...need new O-L Coach?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="12theTruth" data-source="post: 471999"><p>I would think 6 years has been more than enough time for Campen to have made a big dent in creating an identity for this offensive line. Instill solid fundamentals. Create a "well oiled machine" especially this year because the same five have been at it since the first practice of minicamp.</p><p> </p><p>Whether McCarthy's play calling or each individual lineman have deficiencies have less to do with things than Campen getting the best out of his unit and at the very least give the team a fighting chance to convert a 3rd down and 2 or less on a running play.</p><p> </p><p>Watching other NFL games I am very jealous watching other teams having O lineman able to get to the 2nd level with regularity. Not in Green Bay. I think it'd be a powerful statement to ditch Campen now and bring in a zone blocking guru at least till the end of the season. At that point, re-evaluate. Considering half of our games were against poor competition there is no reason the Packers should have the 24th ranked total offense which in large part is largely due to the inability to RUN the ball outside of the 2 yards and a cloud of dust theme.</p><p> </p><p>The funny thing is is that we wouldn't be even having this discussion if our deep threats weren't injured. MM just game plans to cover up for his deficient running game. Until MM takes running the ball serious enough the Packers will have to get the majority of their good rushing yards from Cobb runs, Rodgers scrambles, or when Benson hopefully returns an occasional 5 yard run up the middle.</p><p></p><p>Against the Jags MM's offense pretty shaky on the final drive. The Packers only up by 5, McCarthy calls two runs up the middle which once again were stuffed by the Jags. Rodgers on 3rd down threw one up deep and the Pack were bailed out by a defensive penalty to basically ice the game. That is where an offensive line earns their money in crunch time, and time and again they play like horse manure.</p><p></p><p>Why not try a high percentage WR screen, pick play, sweep, anything but same ole sorry run behind RG. Running clock is important but I would think gaining a first down should carry a little more weight. But thats just me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="12theTruth, post: 471999"] I would think 6 years has been more than enough time for Campen to have made a big dent in creating an identity for this offensive line. Instill solid fundamentals. Create a "well oiled machine" especially this year because the same five have been at it since the first practice of minicamp. Whether McCarthy's play calling or each individual lineman have deficiencies have less to do with things than Campen getting the best out of his unit and at the very least give the team a fighting chance to convert a 3rd down and 2 or less on a running play. Watching other NFL games I am very jealous watching other teams having O lineman able to get to the 2nd level with regularity. Not in Green Bay. I think it'd be a powerful statement to ditch Campen now and bring in a zone blocking guru at least till the end of the season. At that point, re-evaluate. Considering half of our games were against poor competition there is no reason the Packers should have the 24th ranked total offense which in large part is largely due to the inability to RUN the ball outside of the 2 yards and a cloud of dust theme. The funny thing is is that we wouldn't be even having this discussion if our deep threats weren't injured. MM just game plans to cover up for his deficient running game. Until MM takes running the ball serious enough the Packers will have to get the majority of their good rushing yards from Cobb runs, Rodgers scrambles, or when Benson hopefully returns an occasional 5 yard run up the middle. Against the Jags MM's offense pretty shaky on the final drive. The Packers only up by 5, McCarthy calls two runs up the middle which once again were stuffed by the Jags. Rodgers on 3rd down threw one up deep and the Pack were bailed out by a defensive penalty to basically ice the game. That is where an offensive line earns their money in crunch time, and time and again they play like horse manure. Why not try a high percentage WR screen, pick play, sweep, anything but same ole sorry run behind RG. Running clock is important but I would think gaining a first down should carry a little more weight. But thats just me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
scheeler
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: DoURant
34 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
47 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 6:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
Today at 6:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
So I know I'll be flamed for this, but...need new O-L Coach?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top