Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Slow-Wits Head better be coming off!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="weeds" data-source="post: 1825" data-attributes="member: 39"><p>You got it PF ... Bates would be a good DC. ...and you hit it on the ol' nugget, our cap situation is the real issue here...very heavily weighted to the offensive side of the ball -- a given in that Brett's salary is in there. Something of an interesting note here, WBAY in Green Bay last night made reference to the fact that 10 of 11 offensive starters were carry overs from Wolf's era and 7 of 11 starters on defense are tied directly to Mike Sherman's era. I didn't investigate that statement, but I suppose it could be true.</p><p></p><p>I really and truly believe that a concerted effort to establish an NFL calibre defensive line is going to go a long way in moving the Pack back into a 10th, 11th, 12th rated defense. With that, and a Super Bowl offense (still that good if we lose Franks and Wahle), the Pack have a legitimate shot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="weeds, post: 1825, member: 39"] You got it PF ... Bates would be a good DC. ...and you hit it on the ol' nugget, our cap situation is the real issue here...very heavily weighted to the offensive side of the ball -- a given in that Brett's salary is in there. Something of an interesting note here, WBAY in Green Bay last night made reference to the fact that 10 of 11 offensive starters were carry overs from Wolf's era and 7 of 11 starters on defense are tied directly to Mike Sherman's era. I didn't investigate that statement, but I suppose it could be true. I really and truly believe that a concerted effort to establish an NFL calibre defensive line is going to go a long way in moving the Pack back into a 10th, 11th, 12th rated defense. With that, and a Super Bowl offense (still that good if we lose Franks and Wahle), the Pack have a legitimate shot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
DABIGZ
Latest posts
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 11:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 11:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike McCarthy Gone
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:39 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Sean Rhyan missed out on $2 mil bonus by 3 snaps
Latest: Firethorn1001
Yesterday at 6:39 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Slow-Wits Head better be coming off!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top