Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Skin stud n dud
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 854695"><p>And the way they have done that is in three consistent ways: red zone offense, red zone defense and + on turnovers. I've been hammering on this for weeks and it seems eyes glass over.</p><p></p><p>There may be a 4th. factor in the making. Over the last two games the Packers are 5-6 on 4th.down, 6-9 over the last three games, after being dismal for most of the season. They were the last team to convert their first 4th. down this season. Converting a 4th. down is roughly equivalent to a + turnover, obviously no small thing.</p><p></p><p>Rodgers is top 5 in just about every red zone passing category, including first in TDs and yards. The 60+% completion rate in the short field is quite good:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/redzone-passing.htm" target="_blank">https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/redzone-passing.htm</a></p><p></p><p>Compare to last season's stats. Same ol' not great Rodgers? I think not.</p><p></p><p>Not directed at you, but I'm reading a bunch of cr*p about LaFleur's offense being a same old, same old McCarthy redux. I don't know if people are not paying attention, don't understand the plausible latitude available (with this team or in general in the league), or are once again engaging in confirmation bias (not enough points must mean same old, same old), or if it's a case of too much beer or a case of beer, but this is a weird game to make those kinds of observations:</p><p></p><p>28 throws, 18 to backs and TEs, only 10 WR targets. That may be a Rodgers record ratio.</p><p></p><p>Backs getting 29 touches + 3 incomplete targets = 32 plays. If we drop out the last two kneel down plays, the Packers ran 54 plays excluding the sacks (we don't know who those plays were supposed to be run through), 59% went through the backs. That may be another record ratio.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 854695"] And the way they have done that is in three consistent ways: red zone offense, red zone defense and + on turnovers. I've been hammering on this for weeks and it seems eyes glass over. There may be a 4th. factor in the making. Over the last two games the Packers are 5-6 on 4th.down, 6-9 over the last three games, after being dismal for most of the season. They were the last team to convert their first 4th. down this season. Converting a 4th. down is roughly equivalent to a + turnover, obviously no small thing. Rodgers is top 5 in just about every red zone passing category, including first in TDs and yards. The 60+% completion rate in the short field is quite good: [URL]https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/redzone-passing.htm[/URL] Compare to last season's stats. Same ol' not great Rodgers? I think not. Not directed at you, but I'm reading a bunch of cr*p about LaFleur's offense being a same old, same old McCarthy redux. I don't know if people are not paying attention, don't understand the plausible latitude available (with this team or in general in the league), or are once again engaging in confirmation bias (not enough points must mean same old, same old), or if it's a case of too much beer or a case of beer, but this is a weird game to make those kinds of observations: 28 throws, 18 to backs and TEs, only 10 WR targets. That may be a Rodgers record ratio. Backs getting 29 touches + 3 incomplete targets = 32 plays. If we drop out the last two kneel down plays, the Packers ran 54 plays excluding the sacks (we don't know who those plays were supposed to be run through), 59% went through the backs. That may be another record ratio. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Curly Calhoun
PackerDNA
Latest posts
P
NFC North Predictions
Latest: PackerDNA
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: OldSchool101
59 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 4:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:55 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Post Draft/UDFA/Off-Season Signings - Each Position Trade Block
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Skin stud n dud
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
