Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Oannes" data-source="post: 149874" data-attributes="member: 816">Okay Z2C, they did have something to play for.  I was wrong.  They were playing the game, like a pre-season game, trying not to get injured. Do you remember when we beat the Broncos at Lambeau to put us into the playoffs on the day the Vikes choked in Arizona.   How hard was Denver trying that game?  They tanked that game big time.  Our win wasn't the least bit impressive.I do wish you'd answer how you would feel if the roles had been reversed.  I would bet that you would say that the reason the Bears beat the Pack is because we had nothing to play for.If the Bears were really trying to win to go in with momentum, why did they pull Grossman and play Griese for most of the 2nd half?   The Bears had NO intention of playing Griese in the playoffs.  The Bears treated this liek a preseason game and we played like it might be Favre's last game on earth.   I think the incentive arrows were pointing in profoundly differing directions that night and NOTHING can be taken from that game.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 52 (members: 1, guests: 51)