Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kitten" data-source="post: 393673" data-attributes="member: 2692">That's  a really good point. It's not like a fumble where clearly whoever was in possession of the football was at fault. INTs are either the result of a bad or unwise pass or the receiver not making the catch. I don't think the mark (stat) should go against the QB if he was not directly responsible for play resulting in an INT. If it's the receiver's fault, the stat should go against him. But what would you label the stat? rINT for "receiver INT?"I'm going to bring up Favre, close your eyes if you don't want to look. Favre had a mother load of INTs. If this stat were to go into effect and be retroactive, (a mind boggling process for the person who has to sit and review film on every one of every past QBs INTs), could we see a significant drop in Favre's INT rate?It's an interesting concept, one that could have the potential to alter QBRs significantly.</blockquote>

Total: 1,069 (members: 2, guests: 1,067)